HPV AND WHAT areYOU doing??
now thats there is a shot for this std are you going to acquire it? or have your child get it to prevent you from getting it??
Answers: No shots.. I grain that this "drug" has not been tested plenty to be out yet. I seen a couple of weeks ago that some girls be paralyzed after getting the shot. Also I heard of other side effects. Every medication will have a side effect but I a moment ago feel that this particular vaccine hasnt be tested enough. I feel similar to the FDA likes to use the general population as carrying out tests subjects. So nope, no shot for me and no shot for my daughter. Not yet atleast
Ok so you read Gardasil's website and you read the nice part of what they do convey you know where is the info that they dont tell you......
Reactions and death to date in the U.S.:
11 patients have died (Source: VAERS: Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System—Search for "HPV4" and "Patient Died")
84 reaction were considered life threatening (Source: VAERS: Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System—Search for "HPV4" and "Life Threatening")
173 patients be hospitalized
730 patients had not recovered at the time of the report
93 patients are disabled at the time of the report
4306 reported incidents + 2141 (newly found as multiple entries in reports) = 6447 Total
In the U.S., vaccine reaction are available to the public via VAERS, the U.S.A.'s official Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System. However, journalist Cynthia Janak just now noted that the some of the new reports refer to multiple patients—her research uncovered the above total numbers. Note that VAERS receives simply an estimated 1-10% of vaccine reactions/injuries; the vast majority of reactions and injuries (90-99%) are never reported or followed up. Canada have no publicly accessible reporting system, thus enabling health official to keep the public in the shade about vaccine reactions, injuries and death.
Excessive cost: Merck's Gardasil, the vaccine to be used for this program, will cost approximately $400 per person injected. The federal government is contributing $300 million, estimated to be almost one third of the vaccine cost nationwide. The other two thirds must come from the provinces, bringing the total cost nationwide for this one vaccine to almost one billion dollars. This cost is to cover the specified 3 doses of Gardasil for adjectives females 9—13 years as well as females 14—26 years who are deemed to be possibly sure of not already being infected with one or more of the 4 HPV types surrounded by the vaccine.
FDA approval was NOT based on actual cancer prevention: FDA did not approve Gardasil base on the vaccine's actual prevention of cervical cancer but on the prevention of precancerous lesions. How effective is Gardasil contained by decreasing the incidence of cervical cancer? No one knows because this question have not yet been answered. As of April 2007, Gardasil vaccine have never been proven to decrease the actual incidence of cervical cancer. (See article within Cancer Monthly.)
Lack of testing in 9—13 yr olds: The Gardasil monograph states: "efficacy of the vaccine contained by this age group [9—13 yr olds] has not been demonstrated".
Lack of evidence of duration of protection: The single evidence of duration of protection stated on the Gardasil monograph is: "A subset of participants (n=241) in the Phase II quadrivalent vaccine study have been followed for 60 months after dose 1 with dignified sustained vaccine efficacy and no evidence of waning immunity." This system that the only test for duration of efficacy be in a minor sample of 241 elder females, few of whom tested positive for any of the HPV types in the vaccine in a study that last a mere 5 years after the first dose of vaccine was given. Therefore, it can be said that, in common, the duration of any long term efficacy has not be demonstrated and is unknown. In fact, there's already been tell of the need for booster shots.
Benefit of Gardasil to 9—13 year olds is dubious: Due to the unknown duration of efficacy in elder women, the benefit of Gardasil to 9—13 year olds is even more dubious than statement two reveals. To be reliably effective, HPV vaccine would need to be given logically near the time when one or more of the HPV types in the vaccine enter the body. This time is an unknown factor; vaccine efficacy could wane long before virus infiltration occurs or a child might already be infected at the time of inoculation. HPV infection occurs through skin-to-skin contact that's not necessarily due to sexual activity.
Safety contained by conjunction with other vaccines is questionable: The Gardasil monograph states that Gardasil "has no components that hold been found to adversely affect the safety or efficacy of other vaccines." Does this be a sign of that Merck has looked for adverse affects and not found any or that they just haven't bothered to look? Certainly the collection of ingredients aluminum and polysorbate, both known to cause cancer surrounded by lab animals and to alter immune response, together with similar types of ingredients in other vaccines is result in for concern. And Merck's statement doesn't mean that the vaccine as a whole does not affect safekeeping or efficacy. Simultaneous injection of Gardasil with other taxpayer funded vaccines (such as meningococcal, chickenpox, DPT or influenza vaccines) could result in lowered efficacy and/or more adverse reaction.
Gardasil could cause other types of cancer: Unlike other drugs, vaccines are never tested for their ability to produce cancer. Gardasil could provoke other types of cancer, including cervical cancer that's associated near HPV types not in the vaccine. In addition, Gardasil have been very aggressively market with no emphasis on the reality that it can only possibly prevent HPV infection, not clear HPV that's already present; it may actually effect an increase in cervical cancer due to a false feeling of deposit in the females who receive it.
Gardasil does not guarantee safety from HPV: Since inoculation with Gardasil is obviously not a guarantee of freedom from HPV infection near vaccine type virus or others, regular Pap screening tests with their incumbent costs will still be needed.
For more info you can check this site:
http://www.vran.org/vaccines/hpv/hpv.htm
Dont believe everything you read from a pharmaceutical company. other family do research as well..
Related Questions...
Im a diabetic moving to Australia for a year, does anyone know how i can find insulin out near?
Answers: No shots.. I grain that this "drug" has not been tested plenty to be out yet. I seen a couple of weeks ago that some girls be paralyzed after getting the shot. Also I heard of other side effects. Every medication will have a side effect but I a moment ago feel that this particular vaccine hasnt be tested enough. I feel similar to the FDA likes to use the general population as carrying out tests subjects. So nope, no shot for me and no shot for my daughter. Not yet atleast
Ok so you read Gardasil's website and you read the nice part of what they do convey you know where is the info that they dont tell you......
Reactions and death to date in the U.S.:
11 patients have died (Source: VAERS: Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System—Search for "HPV4" and "Patient Died")
84 reaction were considered life threatening (Source: VAERS: Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System—Search for "HPV4" and "Life Threatening")
173 patients be hospitalized
730 patients had not recovered at the time of the report
93 patients are disabled at the time of the report
4306 reported incidents + 2141 (newly found as multiple entries in reports) = 6447 Total
In the U.S., vaccine reaction are available to the public via VAERS, the U.S.A.'s official Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System. However, journalist Cynthia Janak just now noted that the some of the new reports refer to multiple patients—her research uncovered the above total numbers. Note that VAERS receives simply an estimated 1-10% of vaccine reactions/injuries; the vast majority of reactions and injuries (90-99%) are never reported or followed up. Canada have no publicly accessible reporting system, thus enabling health official to keep the public in the shade about vaccine reactions, injuries and death.
Excessive cost: Merck's Gardasil, the vaccine to be used for this program, will cost approximately $400 per person injected. The federal government is contributing $300 million, estimated to be almost one third of the vaccine cost nationwide. The other two thirds must come from the provinces, bringing the total cost nationwide for this one vaccine to almost one billion dollars. This cost is to cover the specified 3 doses of Gardasil for adjectives females 9—13 years as well as females 14—26 years who are deemed to be possibly sure of not already being infected with one or more of the 4 HPV types surrounded by the vaccine.
FDA approval was NOT based on actual cancer prevention: FDA did not approve Gardasil base on the vaccine's actual prevention of cervical cancer but on the prevention of precancerous lesions. How effective is Gardasil contained by decreasing the incidence of cervical cancer? No one knows because this question have not yet been answered. As of April 2007, Gardasil vaccine have never been proven to decrease the actual incidence of cervical cancer. (See article within Cancer Monthly.)
Lack of testing in 9—13 yr olds: The Gardasil monograph states: "efficacy of the vaccine contained by this age group [9—13 yr olds] has not been demonstrated".
Lack of evidence of duration of protection: The single evidence of duration of protection stated on the Gardasil monograph is: "A subset of participants (n=241) in the Phase II quadrivalent vaccine study have been followed for 60 months after dose 1 with dignified sustained vaccine efficacy and no evidence of waning immunity." This system that the only test for duration of efficacy be in a minor sample of 241 elder females, few of whom tested positive for any of the HPV types in the vaccine in a study that last a mere 5 years after the first dose of vaccine was given. Therefore, it can be said that, in common, the duration of any long term efficacy has not be demonstrated and is unknown. In fact, there's already been tell of the need for booster shots.
Benefit of Gardasil to 9—13 year olds is dubious: Due to the unknown duration of efficacy in elder women, the benefit of Gardasil to 9—13 year olds is even more dubious than statement two reveals. To be reliably effective, HPV vaccine would need to be given logically near the time when one or more of the HPV types in the vaccine enter the body. This time is an unknown factor; vaccine efficacy could wane long before virus infiltration occurs or a child might already be infected at the time of inoculation. HPV infection occurs through skin-to-skin contact that's not necessarily due to sexual activity.
Safety contained by conjunction with other vaccines is questionable: The Gardasil monograph states that Gardasil "has no components that hold been found to adversely affect the safety or efficacy of other vaccines." Does this be a sign of that Merck has looked for adverse affects and not found any or that they just haven't bothered to look? Certainly the collection of ingredients aluminum and polysorbate, both known to cause cancer surrounded by lab animals and to alter immune response, together with similar types of ingredients in other vaccines is result in for concern. And Merck's statement doesn't mean that the vaccine as a whole does not affect safekeeping or efficacy. Simultaneous injection of Gardasil with other taxpayer funded vaccines (such as meningococcal, chickenpox, DPT or influenza vaccines) could result in lowered efficacy and/or more adverse reaction.
Gardasil could cause other types of cancer: Unlike other drugs, vaccines are never tested for their ability to produce cancer. Gardasil could provoke other types of cancer, including cervical cancer that's associated near HPV types not in the vaccine. In addition, Gardasil have been very aggressively market with no emphasis on the reality that it can only possibly prevent HPV infection, not clear HPV that's already present; it may actually effect an increase in cervical cancer due to a false feeling of deposit in the females who receive it.
Gardasil does not guarantee safety from HPV: Since inoculation with Gardasil is obviously not a guarantee of freedom from HPV infection near vaccine type virus or others, regular Pap screening tests with their incumbent costs will still be needed.
For more info you can check this site:
http://www.vran.org/vaccines/hpv/hpv.htm
Dont believe everything you read from a pharmaceutical company. other family do research as well..
Related Questions...